← Engagement stories
Consumer omnichannelMulti-site retail4-week diagnostic

Digital was driving the stores, and nobody could prove it

In omnichannel businesses, the most valuable digital outcome is often not a transaction. If it is not measured, digital gets underfunded on principle.

Scale
£30m+ group revenue
Client
Anonymised by default

Quantified movement

Each figure is a measured band against the pre-engagement baseline stated beside it. Ranges are used because the underlying numbers are real and anonymised, not rounded into a single headline claim.

  • Digitally influenced store revenue newly measured

    4.6× reported ecommerce revenue

    Baseline: Previously unmeasured; ecommerce P&L line only

    First full quarter of instrumentation

  • High-intent journey completion

    +18% to +25%

    Baseline: Baseline completion of locator, stock-check and appointment paths

    One quarter post-rebuild

  • Local discovery visibility in priority catchments

    +29% to +37%

    Baseline: Baseline non-brand local impression share

    Two quarters post-engagement

  • Digital budget re-prioritised

    ≈40% of local spend

    Baseline: Baseline allocation by historic revenue rather than catchment potential

    At planning cycle

UK region
Midlands, UK-wide estate
Company stage
Group / multi-site (£50m+)
Constraint found
Measurement scope and omnichannel attribution

Presented as

"Ecommerce is a small percentage of revenue, so digital cannot be the priority."

The real constraint

Measurement scope. Digitally influenced store revenue was invisible, so the business was making budget decisions against a fraction of digital's actual contribution — and internal channel conflict was making it worse.

Where the assumption came from

Digital was reported as an ecommerce P&L line. Store revenue was reported by location. There was no measure of the journeys that started online and finished in a store, which is how most of the category's customers actually behave.

What the diagnostic looked at

Local and category discovery position by catchment, store locator and stock-visibility journeys, appointment and enquiry paths, matched-catchment demand and revenue patterns, and how store and online teams were incentivised.

What it found

Local discovery was weak in several strong catchments and strong in weaker ones, with no relationship to investment. High-intent journeys — stock availability, locator, appointment booking — carried significant friction. Incentives actively discouraged staff from supporting online-originated demand.

What changed

A digitally influenced revenue measure was defined and instrumented, local discovery investment was prioritised by catchment potential rather than history, the high-intent journeys were rebuilt as a first-class experience, and incentives were adjusted so store teams benefited from online-originated demand.

Would the same diagnosis hold in your business?

The Growth Economics Snapshot takes a few minutes and shows where your biggest commercial lever sits before you commit to anything.