Owned growth plan
A prioritised plan and forecast, revisited on a quarterly commercial rhythm.
Ongoing
We own the growth plan alongside your leadership team: prioritisation, budget and channel decisions, specialist coordination, implementation oversight and honest performance review.
Why this exists
Many established businesses have capable execution and no single senior owner of the whole growth picture. Embedded Growth provides that ownership at a fraction of the cost of a full leadership team, with specialists brought in only where execution is genuinely required.
Where it fits
Probably not for
Investment
£6,000 – £15,000 per month, minimum three months, plus specialist delivery at cost
Per month, no minimum lock-in beyond the notice period
Investment-fit estimator
Published band: £6,000 – £15,000 per month, minimum three months, plus specialist delivery at cost. This narrows it to your situation. Nothing is captured and no one contacts you.
Answer all four to see the band.
Sample output
Every engagement starts from the same analytical standard. The Growth Diagnostic sample report is the clearest illustration of it — full scorecard, constraint map and 90-day plan, anonymised and free to read.
Read the sample reportDeliverables
A prioritised plan and forecast, revisited on a quarterly commercial rhythm.
Where the next pound goes, and what it comes out of.
Agencies and specialists briefed, sequenced and held to commercial outcomes.
Progress owned rather than observed, with decisions made in the open.
A short board-readable view of what changed and what it means.
Process, standards and judgement transferred to your team as we go.
Scope
Shape
Month 1
Diagnostic-grade review, plan and cadence agreed with leadership.
Ongoing
Prioritisation, specialist coordination and implementation oversight.
Quarterly
Reallocate investment, and say plainly what should stop.
Illustrative example
A hypothetical scenario, not a client result.
Situation
Four suppliers each report success while blended contribution has been flat for three quarters.
Conventional answer
Replace the worst-performing supplier and renegotiate fees.
What the evidence shows
Each scope is optimised locally, nobody owns the blended picture, and the same demand is being claimed more than once.
The decision
Consolidate reporting to contribution, restate each supplier's accountability, and reallocate budget against one ranked plan rather than four competing ones.
Artefacts
Named documents and working assets, yours to keep and reuse — with or without us.
Questions
Hesitations
It is deliberately senior time without the permanence. If a full-time leader is the right answer, we will say so — and Embedded Growth is often the cleanest way to define that role properly and hand over to it.
Then do not start here. A diagnostic or a sprint answers the question at a fixed cost first; retained work makes sense once there is a plan worth holding to and a reason for senior ownership.
Embedded Growth sits above both, owning prioritisation and the commercial read rather than delivery. Where that layer already exists and works, you do not need us.
Where this sits
Evidence and context
By business model
The seven lenses stay the same. The economics, the constraints and the metrics we read them through do not.
For DTC brands, specialist retailers and marketplace-reliant businesses where top-line growth has decoupled from contribution — a senior review of acquisition cost, retention economics, conversion and merchandising.
For businesses selling into committees and complex buying journeys, where lead volume, quality, conversion and sales cycle all interact and no single dashboard tells the whole story.
For consumer brands and retailers with stores, showrooms, concessions or distributors alongside ecommerce, where channel-siloed reporting hides more than it reveals.
Output
Worth knowing
If nobody currently owns the whole growth picture, that is usually the first thing to fix.